Sample | Total of samples in data file | Best Allan Variance for blocks of 100 samples | Worst Allan Variance for blocks of 100 samples | Allan Variance for blocks of 500 samples |
1 of 5 | 1000 | 4.82377e-11 | 5.71838e-11 | 5.29407e-11 |
2 of 5 | 1117 640 28844 |
6.68643e-11 9.29478e-11 5.12798e-11 |
7.84872e-11 4.02818e-10 1.54877e-10 |
7.06435e-11 2.00688e-10 5.70214e-11 |
3 of 5 | 1000 | 1.57479e-10 | 3.85815e-10 | 1.81410e-10 |
4 of 5 | 1000 10,000 |
5.76400e-10 3.64539e-10 |
3.01120e-09 2.15924e-08 |
1.16787e-09 4.37509e-10 |
5 of 5 | 1000 | 5.08528e-11 | 2.35990e-10 | 6.83699e-11 |
In any particular table row, the upper entry is earlier, the lower entry is later.
Results of #1, #2 and #5 suggest that some percentage of the RTXT part could be good enough for IceCube.
Short term stability appears to improves (toward an asymptote) as
the
parts accumulate more time under power..
For these samples, the integrated operating time was not recorded,
unfortunately...
Statistics are poor.
Note that #4 didn't improve to the level of acceptability.
Note that #2 doesn't appear to settle down.
When time permits, both #2 and #4 will be burned in longer and
retested.
Data files are available on request. Email me...
Measurements and analysis by Gerald Przybylski, Lawrence Berkeley
National
Laboratory, for IceCube.