One DOM per twisted pair would result in a cable too big, and too heavy to transport to the pole in an LC-130, and too large for easy handling. The alternative would be to use two cables per string, since deploying with multiple cables is manageable and has been done in the past. So, flight availability and cost comprise the major limitations.
Two DOMs per pair carries several consequences:
The solution described here addresses the remainder of the
list
items.
The PSC-2-2 parts pose a problem since they must either be sealed into a pressure resisting housing, or must be made to tolerate the high ambient pressure of deployment and over pressure during the freeze-in.
The manufacturer provided partly unpackaged power splitters, above figure, for evaluation.
The mechanical example of a possible implementation might be this:
Imagine a proper printed circuit board with the right interconnections, instead of prototyping board.
In order to make the above assembly more pressure resistant, imagine that the power splitter components are, perhaps, each cast into epoxy.
Alternately, imagine epoxy extending to the edge of the fiberglass-epoxy PCB. (requires soldering before potting)
The epoxy must fill the gap between the metal base and the white
ceramic
PCB to equalize stress under pressure and prevent cracking.
Several solutions exist for how to connect wires to the board.
Solder, for instance. It's simple but could be problem prone.
For instance, cold solder joints coming are mechanically weak, and
can break when flexed. If the break occurs during freeze-in, the
optical modules are probably lost.
The green terminal blocks depicted above would be soldered to PC
board
before potting.
The pair of wires to the surface connect on the right side, and the
pairs of wires to each DOM connect on the left.
The terminal blocks are screw type for easy, reliable installation
with known, repeatable, mechanical properties
Two of these assemblies, or one double assembly, would be molded into 'octopus cable assemblies' by the contractor for IceCube.
Some preliminary measurements appear here.
G. Przybylski February 15, 2001