Local Coincidence in AMANDA string 18, and IceTop.

Background:

The idea of using local coincidence,  a trigger level filter in the DOMs, arose in 1999 for the purpose of reducing the amount of data that needed to be transmitted from the DOMs to the surface over a cable with limited bandwidth.   The need for better bandwidth utilization arose as the estimates of trigger rates, and the set of data that constituted an event continued to expand. 

The gist of the idea is this:  If two adjacent DOMs are 'hit' within a time window of a few hundred ns of each other, then they most likely both saw light from the same event.  The chance that two noise hits overlap in that time window is finite, but very small.  Circuits were added to the DOMs that allowed them to send short signals to each other, bidirectionally, over one pair of wires.  The circuit depends on the port to port isolation characteristic of a power splitter.

The IceCube and IceTop DOMs extend the flexibility of the LC configuration,  and increase its immunity to deployment limitiations, like LC cable impedance mismatches.   IceCube DOMs include an  independant LC circuit for each communications direction, and bipolar (window) comparators for signaling detection. 

Power splitters/combiners are transmission line products, which produce best results when, and in some sense, depend upon impedance matching at every port.    Power splitter modules consist of coupled inductors, a transformer, and a resistor that defines the system impedance.    An external shunt resistance can, of course, be used to 'pull' the impedance of the module in order to match the impedance of lines that connect modules together. 

The basic configuration of the DOM, which is based on  75 Ω power splitters, and  a 2:1 transformer,  matches a nominal 150 Ω cable from DOM to DOM.    Shunt resistors, and several other resistor substitutions permit matching impedances in the range of [120Ω to 150 Ω].  The available LC cable (choice made by the IceCube cable engineers) will, in the end,  place constraints on the LC circuit in the DOM.   Component values in the DOM will be adjusted to provide the best match and noise margin.

The AMANDA circuit

The IceCube circuit

2003/2004 First Deployment of the IceCube circuit

A 2003/2004 Summer Season deployment of  IceCube DOMs,  colaboration between U of Wisconsin Madison Physics (IceCube project office) and U of Delaware Bertol Institute (IceTop project office) brings together all the components... and brings to light all the surprises one might expect from a three, or more way colaboration.   Late in the integration process it was discovered that the custom manufactured cable with a target impedance in the range of 140 Ω actually measured in the range of 120 Ω to 130 Ω.  The available quad cable left over from AMANDA deployments measured approximately 160 Ω.   The significance of these cable impedance mismatches to a system designed for a target impedance of 150 Ω had not been considered, much less appreciated.

Cable mismatches are usually characterized as a ratio of impedances where the larger impedance is divided by the smaller impedance (by convention) and the quantity is known as the Standing Wave Ratio.  The SWR predicts the amount of power reflected back to the source by an impedance mismatch.    The SWR of  160/120= 1.33 seemed disturbingly high.  Therefore, simulations of various possible cable combinations and LC circuit design impedances were undertaken to see whether special attention was needed (or how forgiving the circuit was of cable mismatches).

Simulation components:
The simulation exploits some inside knowledge of power splitter construction in order to simplify the circuit, and reduce the number of components involved.     The simulation also utilizes a lossy transmission line model, though for such short line lengths, a lossless model would suffice.   Real transmission line components are necessary to observe the reflected signals that are a consequence of impedance mismatches.

The characteristic impedance of the LC transceiver depends on the values of three resistors.  The characteristic impedance of  the transmission lines in the spice model depend on adjustable parameters of the model... expressed in L, the inductance per meter, and C, the capacitance per meter. 
The impedance and delay are given by the following equations:


Zo  =

Math Expression

Td  =

Math Expression


The above is a system of two equations in two unknowns, and easily solved L and C for given Zo and Td, .
The delay is adjusted by a factor of 0.66 to account for the dielectric constant of polyethylene (a delay of 5.05 ns / meter).

Summary:

Seven simulations are posted below.

To renormalize for IceCube DOM levels, divide voltage values by 2. 
The IceCube DOM transmitted LC level, measured at the combiner input port is 0.25V>
The IceCube DOM received LC Thresholds are 75mV,  symmetric about the LC system offset level, for an expected 125mV received signal level.

Comparison of the plot files yields a good feel for how mismatches produce waveform distortions.

Simulations1(plot) (sch) (sim) (zip):
DOM LC impedance = 130 Ω
Pair Cable = 130 Ω

Black cable = 
130 Ω  (as a check)
This simulation is a check of the basic simulation which should, and does, perform perfectly. i.e. no reflections.

Simulations2:(plot) (sch) (sim) (zip):
DOM LC impedance = 130 Ω
Pair Cable = 130 Ω

Black cable = 
140 Ω (New, Solid Polyethylene dielectric Ericsson quad cable)
This simulation for the case where DOM MB components are adjusted to match the 130
Ω cable, and 50 feet of the new Ericsson quad cable connect the two DOM  penetrator pigtails..

Simulations3:(plot) (sch) (sim) (zip):
DOM LC impedance = 130 Ω
Pair Cable = 130 Ω

Black cable = 
160 Ω (Old, Foamed Polyethylene dielectric Ericsson quad cable)
This simulation for the case where DOM MB components are adjusted to match the 130 Ω cable, and 50 feet of the old Ericsson quad cable connect the two DOM  penetrator pigtails..

Simulationsr4:(plot) (sch) (sim) (zip):
DOM LC impedance = 150 Ω
Pair Cable = 130 Ω

Black cable = 
140 Ω (New, Solid Polyethylene dielectric Ericsson quad cable)
This simulation for the case where DOM MB components are not adjusted, and 50 feet of the new Ericsson quad cable connect the two DOM  penetrator pigtails..

Simulationsr5:(plot) (sch) (sim) (zip):
DOM LC impedance = 150 Ω
Pair Cable = 130 Ω

Black cable = 
160 Ω (Old, Foamed Polyethylene dielectric Ericsson quad cable)
This simulation for the case where DOM MB components are not adjusted, and 50 feet of the old Ericsson quad cable connect the two DOM  penetrator pigtails..

Simulationsr6:(plot) (sch) (sim) (zip):
DOM LC impedance = 140 Ω
Pair Cable = 130 Ω

Black cable = 
140 Ω (New, Solid Polyethylene dielectric Ericsson quad cable)
This simulation for the case where DOM MB components are adjusted to match the 140 Ω cable, and 50 feet of the new Ericsson quad cable connect the two DOM  penetrator pigtails..

Simulationsr7:(plot) (sch) (sim) (zip):
DOM LC impedance = 150 Ω
Pair Cable = 130 Ω

Black cable = 
100 Ω (This simulation tests the robustness of the face of gross mismatches)
This simulation for an arbitrarily chosen worst case case mismatch condition where DOM MB components are not adjusted. Ten foot lengths of the colored pairs are used, and fifty feet of 100 ohm couples the sections of colored pair together.

(sim) Pspice (demo) simulation file containing data points for all nodes in the model.  Suitable for examining results in detail or creating new plots.
(plot) pdf file of plot of indicated voltage test points.
(sch) pdf schematic of the circuit simulated
(zip) Zip file containing all the pspice files for the simulation.

Sorry... but Pspice makes some pretty crummy color choices.  However, the pdf files are editable with Adobe Illustrator.

Comments? Questions? Corrections? Contact Gerald Przybylski,
mailto