Delay Required by Photomultiplier Signal Path

The IceCube digital optical module depends upon the Analog Transient Waveform Digitizer chip to capture and digitize photomultiplier pulses.  Since the ATWD only acquires data when 'launched' or 'triggered',  and since the triggering is done synchronous to the system main clock,  the photomultiplier signal must be delayed on its way to the ATWD analog inputs long enough so that it arrives after the trigger signal.

The delay duration must be at least one clock cycle, plus the logic delay in the FPGA trigger circuit, plus the trigger comparator propagation delay, plus the propagation delay of signals from point to point around the PC board, plus a three sample start-up delay of the ATWD sampling circuit  itself.  In addition to those strictly hardware requirements, waveform analysis may be improved or simplified by capturing several baseline samples before the abrupt edge of the waveform.  For a 40 MHz fast system clock speed (25 ns clock period), the necessary delay is estimated to be 60 ns.

This delay products tested so far are:
RG-62B/U, the 95 Omega coax cable used for the AMANDA String 18 DOMs,
RG-180B/U, another 95 Omega coax cable, but smaller diameter,
PCB Strip-line done in FR4,
Lumped Delay Line similar to one used in KAMLAND
PCB Strip-line done in low-loss laminate.

For PMT waveforms through RG-62B/U, through RG-180B/U, through FR-4 strip-line, through lumped delay line, and through low-loss strip-line

There is still time to think of novel solutions.  Ideas here.

The AMANDA string 18 digital optical modules used coax cable of an impedance that best matched other requirements of the signal path (100 ohms).

RG-62/U Delay Measurements

Test 1: 49 foot length of RG-62B/U (polyethylene) coax cable like that used for delay for AMANDA string 18 DOMs.
Comment: Performance Acceptable for IceCube   Setup: 50 ohm source impedance. Parallel 100 ohm resistor at inpjut,
and series 50 ohm resistor at output to scope internal 50 ohm termination. There are other cables in the 93-100 ohm range.
 
 
 

RG-180/U Delay Cable Measurement

Test 2: 25.5 foot length of RG-180/U (teflon) coax cable like that used for AMANDA string 18 DOM PMT anode signal.
Comment: Performance Acceptable for IceCube



PCB Delay Line delay and rise time results
 

Test 3: Printed Circuit Bord Delay line produced at the direction of Dan Wahl, of U of Wisconsin SSEC. The delay line is actually a strip-line embedded in printed circuit baord.   The impedance measured 105 ohms by TDR method using fast pulser and fast oscilloscope.   The delay (cursors) includes 4ns delay in the test setup.  The oscilloscope rise-time measurements are based on the standard 10%-to-90% reference points.
Comment:



Data Delay brand Lumped Delay line measurement

Test 4: Data Delay Devices brand lumped delay line (62 ohm impedance). Setup: The source impedance was 50 ohms. The input impedance of the delay line was matched to the source with a parallel 260 ohm resistor.  The 62 ohm output impedance of the delay line was matched to the oscilloscope input with a 12 ohm series resistor.
Comment:



Low Loss PCB Delay Line driven by square pulse
Test 5: Printed Circuit Bord Delay line produced at the direction of Dan Wahl, of U of Wisconsin SSEC. This delay line is also a strip-line embedded in printed circuit baord.  The laminate stack-up includes thick, low absorbtion layers above and below the strip-line layers in the middle.   The impedance measured 96 ohms by TDR method using fast pulser and fast oscilloscope.
The input waveform data file in binary form, and in spreadsheet form.
The output waveform data file in binary form., and in spreadsheet form.
The 1.3 meter active oscilloscope probe cable effectively subtracts 5.0 ns of propagation delay from the measurement
of the delay PCB.  So, the total, corrected, delay is 62.4 ns.
Comment:


Test for systematic measurement errors

Test Ref:  The input matching network used for the coax cable tests was connected directly to the output matching network to demonstrate that the system was well behaved.

For all the above measurements, the instrumentation was as follows:

Questions and comments should be directed to the author: Gerald Przybylski,